September 2005
IRS rule affects written tax
advice
Circular 230 imposes strict
requirements on written opinions, harsh penalties on non-compliant tax
professionals, and thinner protection for taxpayers
The IRS has issued new rules that will affect
how we, as your tax professionals, communicate with you, as our client. The
rules, which went into effect June 21 and are contained in IRS Circular 230,
apply whenever we provide you with tax advice in any written form (letter,
memo, fax, email, etc.).
The rules stem from the federal government’s
concern over abusive tax shelters and its desire to prevent promoters of tax
shelters from obtaining generic, boiler-plate tax opinions. Taxpayers engaging
in abusive transactions use these types of opinions to escape tax penalties of
20% or more, on top of what they owe in taxes, by claiming they “reasonably”
and “in good faith” relied on the tax opinion for their belief that the
transaction was permissible.
The rules outline two categories of written tax
advice: “covered opinions” and “other written advice.” A covered opinion is
written advice concerning a federal tax issue arising from:
-
a specific list of abusive tax-motivated
transactions,
-
any
entity or plan where tax avoidance is its principal purpose, or
-
any
plan or arrangement where tax avoidance is a significant purpose, if certain
conditions are met.
Common transactions affected.
Unfortunately for tax professionals and their clients, the new rules also
apply to advice given on many common and accepted transactions.
Under the new rules, you cannot rely on a tax
opinion for protection from penalties unless you receive a comprehensive
opinion that discusses all relevant facts and laws and how they relate to each
other; a conclusion as to the legal consequences of each tax issue; and the
likelihood that you will prevail in an IRS challenge.
The “significant purpose of tax avoidance”
standard is vague, in large part because the IRS did not want to create any
loopholes; consequently, we could be effectively required to apply the new
rules to many routine, non-abusive transactions. It would appear likely that
almost all tax planning strategies could be deemed to have a significant tax
avoidance purpose.
As tax advisors, we can be severely penalized
for providing written advice that does not meet the above requirements.
Penalties include disbarment from practice before the IRS.
Disclaimer. An alternative to writing an
expensive opinion is to include a disclaimer on written advice that we furnish
to you. Therefore, we will routinely attach a disclaimer, such as the
following, to written tax advice so that there is no issue if the advice is
deemed related to a transaction for which tax avoidance is a significant
purpose:
“The drafter of this document’s
written tax advice did not intend nor write the advice to be used to avoid
any penalty imposed by a taxing authority, nor may the user/recipient of
this document use this document’s written tax advice for that purpose.”
Even with this disclaimer, other defenses to
penalties are available to you, and you will not be automatically penalized if
the IRS challenges a transaction.
Please be assured that we will continue to act
diligently to meet your needs. Use of this disclaimer does not change the
quality of our service or the depth of advice you have come to expect from us.
Only when circumstances dictate, and only after consultation with you, will we
provide a comprehensive opinion pursuant to the new rules.
Based in Mesa, Arizona, and serving closely held businesses in the East Valley,
the Phoenix area and throughout Arizona, Schmidt Westergard & Company, PLLC, is
an independent full-service tax, audit, accounting and business advisory firm
focusing on the middle market.
|