March 2006
LLCs and S corporations a compatible duo
The popularity of limited liability
companies shouldn’t blind you to the distinct benefits of the venerable S
corp
While limited liability companies (LLCs)
seem to be the legal entity of choice for many business owners, it is
still wise to consider whether using an S corporation, alone or in
conjunction with an LLC, is appropriate. This strategy, which lets you
acquire or manage your business or real estate and maximize the limited
liability benefits with more favorable tax treatment, has really rendered
the use of a sole proprietorship or general partnership to the
inexperienced.
An LLC is generally taxed as a partnership.
An LLC can, however, elect to be treated for tax purposes as an S
corporation or a C corporation. In this article we are assuming that the
LLC is taxable as a partnership.
An S corporation and an LLC are formed in
very similar ways. Each has documents that allow for their creation as
well as rules that govern the entity operation. Another similar issue of
concern involves ownership by multiple parties, i.e., multiple
shareholders or members. In either an LLC or a corporation, the parties
should enter into a buy/sell agreement to govern their rights upon the
occurrence of certain events, such as divorce, death or disability.
As similar as the two entities are, the
differences are important. For instance:
-
An S corporation cannot be owned by more
than 75 shareholders, while an LLC can have an unlimited number of
members.
-
An S corporation can have only one class of
stock, while an LLC offers greater flexibility with respect to the
division of control and profits.
-
An S corp cannot be owned by a non-resident
alien, whereas an LLC may be owned by any person.
Perhaps the two most significant
differences, though, involve tax treatment.
When an LLC is capitalized with an asset,
that asset can be distributed to its members without taxable consequences.
For example, if two partners form and capitalize an LLC with two pieces of
property, they could subsequently distribute one property to one member
and the other property to the other member without incurring any tax
consequences. This is true even if the distribution occurs many years
after the acquisition.
That is not true with an S corporation.
When the assets that were used to capitalize a corporation are divided
between the owners, that normally gives rise to a taxable event to each
shareholder receiving a distribution. The impact can be profound, in that
the shareholder is taxed as though there were a sale from the corporation
at fair market value. In other words, years of appreciation within the
respective properties would be subject to taxation. While there are a
unique set of rules which allow a corporation, in limited circumstances,
to be treated in the same way as the LLC, the entire issue can be avoided
by using the LLC form of ownership for any asset which is appreciating in
nature.
Withholding tax. Perhaps the most
important feature of an S corporation, which allows it to continue to
thrive, is the ability to distinguish between wage earning income (which
is subject to withholding tax) and income that is derived as a return on
investment. Any person who is self employed or employed by an entity in
which he or she is the owner is subject to wage withholding tax (as is any
employee). But as the employer, this business owner is also paying the
employer’s portion of the withholding tax on his own income – amounting to
a “penalty” of 15% or more on wages up to the FICA limit. An S corporation
is the only method of ownership that clearly allows you to distinguish
between what you earn as an employee and what you earn as a return on your
investment.
With respect to C corporations, the return
on investment money is subject to double taxation, which is roughly
equivalent to the wage withholding tax penalty. The wage-earning services
that you are performing on behalf of your corporation are easy to
quantify. You can bypass the double taxation if you qualify to be an owner
of an S corporation and pay yourself a wage that is reasonable by industry
standards. You are entitled to a return on your investment, and you can
avoid paying withholding tax on the non-wage earning portion.
There is, however, a method of recognizing
the beneficial attributes of an LLC and an S corp when it comes to
investing in and managing real estate. By holding the asset in an LLC, you
protect your appreciation from potential taxation. By managing the asset
pursuant to a management agreement through an S corp, you are able to
distinguish between compensation for services rendered and income that is
a return on investment.
Based in Mesa, Arizona, and serving closely held businesses in the East Valley,
the Phoenix area and throughout Arizona, Schmidt Westergard & Company, PLLC, is
an independent full-service tax, audit, accounting and business advisory firm
focusing on the middle market.
|