September 2007
Latest tax legislation brings mostly good news
The Small Business and Work Opportunity Tax Act is
meant to help offset scheduled increases in the federal minimum wage
In late May, Congress passed another major tax
law, the Small Business and Work Opportunity Tax Act of 2007, to which we will
refer in this article as “the Act.” The stated purpose of the new legislation,
which President Bush signed into law on May 25, was to provide small business
owners with tax relief to help offset scheduled increases in the federal
minimum wage.
Consistent with that intent, the Act contains
several changes that will be welcome news for businesses, in the form of
better depreciation, an improved tax credit for hiring certain workers, and a
new structure for businesses co-owned by a husband and wife.
Section 179 Expanded Depreciation
One of the more important tax provisions for small
businesses has been the ability to claim a first-year Section 179 depreciation
deduction of up to $100,000 in equipment additions. This provision has been
inflation-indexed annually and recently reached $108,000.
The Act increases the Section 179 annual dollar
limit to $125,000, effective for tax years beginning in 2007. And, in an
important corollary adjustment, the asset addition phase-out threshold has
been increased to $500,000. For the small business owner, understanding this
phase-out threshold may be the more important development. As eligible
equipment additions within any year exceed this phase-out threshold, there is
a dollar-for-dollar reduction in the eligible Section 179 amount. For
businesses reporting on fiscal years, the old limits apply for tax years
beginning in 2006 and ending in 2007. Here is a summary of those amounts:
Tax Year
Beginning |
Sec. 179
Annual Limit |
Asset Addition
Phase-out Range |
| 2006 |
$108,000 |
$430,000-538,000 |
| 2007 |
$125,000 |
$500,000-625,000 |
Example. Ajax
Construction, a calendar-year, subchapter S corporation, is enjoying a
profitable year and acquires a number of items of equipment in 2007 to
improve its depreciation deductions. The sum of those asset additions is
$600,000. Ajax must reduce its $125,000 Section 179 limit for 2007 by
$100,000, the amount by which its qualifying property acquisitions exceed
$500,000. Accordingly, Ajax may claim only $25,000 of Section 179 deductions
for 2007. Had Ajax limited its current-year equipment additions to $500,000,
it would have qualified for a full $125,000 first-year Section 179
deduction.
Small business owners who are able to budget their annual equipment additions
to stay beneath the asset addition phase-out threshold may actually have
greater first-year depreciation deductions than those who exceed that
threshold!
Spousal Joint Ventures
In
general, if an entity has two or more owners, it must report as either a
partnership or a corporation. In theory, it has not been possible for two
individuals to simply split a business and each report their respective share
of the income and deductions as a proprietorship within their respective Form
1040s.
Beginning in 2007, the new legislation provides a special election for a
husband and wife, allowing them to treat a “qualified joint venture” as two
proprietorships rather than a more formal partnership. A qualified joint
venture is available if the only members are a husband and wife who file a
joint Form 1040. Further, both spouses must materially participate in the
business activity, to the extent of at least 500 hours per year. Finally, this
is an elective provision to which both spouses must consent.
When this election is made, the spouses can avoid the formality of filing an
actual partnership return. Rather, each spouse simply reports the respective
share of the joint venture as a sole proprietorship. Each proprietorship share
is subject to the self-employment Social Security tax.
Please Note: While this new rule
provides welcome simplicity, it generally does not produce any direct tax
savings. Further, until the IRS provides guidance on making the election and
operating guidelines for these spousal joint ventures, it would be premature
to take action.
Liberalized Rules for S Corporations
The Act makes the following favorable changes (among others) to the S
corporation tax rules.
S Corp Stock and Securities Gains Not Treated as Passive Income.
When an S corporation has earnings and profits (E&P) from prior C corporation
years, it can be exposed to a corporate-level tax on excess net passive
income. In addition, the corporation’s S status can be revoked if more than
25% of gross receipts are from passive investment income for three consecutive
years. Effective for tax years beginning after May 25, 2007, gains from an S
corporation’s sales of stock and securities will not count as passive
investment income for purposes of these unfavorable rules.
Pre-1983 E&P Eliminated for Certain S Corps. If a corporation
was an S corporation for any tax year that began before 1983 and was not an S
corporation for its first tax year that began after December 31, 1996, any
earnings and profits (E&P) accumulated during pre-1983 S corporation years are
eliminated from the corporation’s accumulated E&P balance. For an affected S
corporation, this favorable provision can reduce the amount of distributions
that will be treated as taxable dividends. The change takes effect at the
start of the first S corporation tax year that begins after May 25, 2007.
Liberalized Jobs Tax Credit
For years, the tax law has provided tax credits to encourage employers to hire
disadvantaged workers from one of nine targeted groups. At a minimum, the
credit is $2,400 for each eligible hire (40% of the first $6,000 of wages).
Individuals from some groups qualify for greater credits, and those credits
extend into the second year of employment of that individual. The targeted
groups have included disabled veterans, rehabilitation referrals, food stamp
recipients, and members of families receiving welfare benefits.
The Act has expanded one of the targeted categories in a very significant
manner, in a change that has not been well-publicized to the business
community. The new category of eligible workers is labeled “designated
community residents.” It must be an individual who, on the date of hire, is in
the 18-39 age group and whose principal residence is within a “rural renewal”
county. A rural renewal county is any county that (a) is outside of a
metropolitan statistical area and (b) has had a population loss from 1990
through 1994, and again from 1995 through 1999. The IRS instructions for Form
8850 identifies the counties within each state that qualify as rural renewal
counties. (Form 8850 instructions are available at
www.irs.gov, under Forms and
Instructions.) Assuming that an individual meeting these criteria is employed
and earns at least $6,000, the employer will qualify for a potential $2,400
Work Opportunity Tax Credit.
The individual must have been engaged to begin work after May 25, 2007, and
must be certified at the time of hire by the state workforce agency for the
applicable location. Employers have only 28 days after the job applicant
begins work to submit a certification request to their state workforce agency.
IRS Form 8850, Pre-Screening Notice and Certification Request for the Work
Opportunity Credit, is used for this purpose.
Any business that may have hired a “rural renewal” county resident within the
last 28 days should submit this paperwork to the state employment agency, so
that the agency can investigate and complete the certification that will allow
this tax credit. A key aspect is that the worker does not need to be a
low-income individual or in any other disadvantaged category. This could, in
fact, be a highly paid professional worker who happens to reside in a county
that has experienced population losses during the prior decade.
As
a further benefit, any Work Opportunity Tax Credit now has a greater
likelihood of producing immediate tax savings. In the past, this and other
business credits have been allowed to reduce regular tax but not alternative
minimum tax (AMT). Consequently, many business owners could utilize only small
amounts of these credits annually, even though their business may have
qualified for large tax credits. But for tax years beginning after 2006, the
Work Opportunity Tax Credit will offset any tax, whether it is regular tax or
AMT. This will make these jobs credits even more lucrative than in the past.
Based in Mesa, Arizona, and serving closely held businesses in the East Valley,
the Phoenix area and throughout Arizona, Schmidt Westergard & Company, PLLC, is
an independent full-service tax, audit, accounting and business advisory firm
focusing on the middle market.
|