|
How to Spot
Fraud
There’s probably
no ironclad way to prevent fraud in your company, but you may hold down
your losses with proper management
If you rely solely on outside auditors and fraud examiners to uncover your
losses due to employee fraud, you may be closing the barn door after the
horse has gone.
A conventional audit may not reveal fraud, since most audits rely on
sampling. If evidence of fraudulent transactions doesn’t make it into the
sample, any isolated or ongoing instances of fraud may not be discovered
and, as a result, may be allowed to continue.
Even a forensic audit, in which typically every transaction is reviewed,
is reactive in that it reveals what has already occurred and points to the
responsible people and practices that have robbed your company of
hard-earned profits.
The persons who are best situated to take a proactive role in spotting and
preventing fraud in your company are you and your employees – those who
review transactions and maintain relationships with outside parties on a
daily basis.
Thus, effective management includes implementing and enforcing policies
that hold each employee responsible for being aware of and responsible for
preventing fraud in their area. Such policies include an attitude of zero
tolerance toward fraud, with no "acceptable" level of loss due to theft,
embezzlement or pilferage. Fraud consultant John J. Hall, writing in the
October 1996 Journal of Accountancy, suggests that you and your managers
follow a four-step approach to putting teeth in your fraud-prevention
policies.
Understand what can go wrong. Before you can create effective
controls, you must consider what can go wrong in each area. This step is
as difficult as it is essential, since white-collar thieves know more
about their opportunities to commit fraud than you know about how to catch
them.
You may be aware of the potential for fraud via credit card misuse, fake
vendors, inventory theft, kickbacks, bad loans, etc. But you probably
don’t know, in specific detail, how to commit each type of fraud. Your
crooked employees do.
Re-examine your company’s experiences with fraud. Every type of business
is more susceptible to certain forms of fraud than to others. If you have
already detected fraud in your company, the smart money would be on the
same or similar type of fraud attempted by someone else. Re-examine how
past offenders did what they did, and recognize the position they held
within the company.
Involve in your current examination every department in your company that
was involved in or exploited by past fraud; ask key employees in those
departments to offer scenarios in which fraud could be committed. Ask them
questions such as these:
-
Which jobs are likely to provide
opportunities for fraud?
-
What opportunities do employees, managers,
vendors and customers have to defraud the company?
-
If a fraudulent transaction occurred in your
area, in which reports or ledgers would evidence likely be found?
-
How could reports be altered to conceal a
fraudulent transaction?
After you have gathered feedback from your employees, take a fresh look at
your controls. Take whatever steps are necessary to maximize their
effectiveness, and instruct your employees about whom to contact if a
transaction or report raises suspicion in their minds. Expand their scope
to include detecting fraud, not just preventing it.
Be alert to change. Even though you subsequently created controls
designed to prevent history from repeating itself, be aware that changes
in your company’s situation – downsizing, expansion, merger, outsourcing,
automation, etc. – might render those controls obsolete. Further, while
employees in fraud-sensitive positions may have a track record of
integrity, be aware also that changes in their situation – financial
hardship, divorce, stress, vices, etc. – can cause them to stray from
their otherwise honest paths.
Look it up. Researching your exposure to fraud has been made easier
with the development of the Internet. Performing a search on "fraud" and
related terms can make you more aware of how other companies have been
defrauded and how you can learn from their less-than-positive experiences
to improve your company’s internal controls.
Look outside. You need not confine your research of fraud potential
to your internal resources. Many trade organizations offer an excellent
source of statistics, ideas and solutions that are specific to their
industry. In addition, CPA firms, law firms and other professions that
specialize in serving members of your industry can provide insight to help
you anticipate problems.
Recognize the symptoms. Even after you’ve been victimized by fraud,
you may be slow to realize it and to take remedial action unless you’re
alert to its symptoms, such as:
-
multiple endorsements on commercial checks;
-
refunds to parties with common names
("Smith" or "Jones") or to companies whose names look familiar but are
misspelled or subtly altered;
-
recurring line items in standard
reconciliations;
-
complaints from customers regarding
collection efforts for balances they’ve already paid;
-
adjustments to inventory reports or customer
accounts;
-
vendor addresses that have not been
independently verified and, thus, may be identical to employee
addresses;
-
no recorded proceeds from the sale of
capital assets; and
-
unusual or unsupported journal entries.
If one of the symptoms of fraud is present, look into it immediately. Be
careful, though; it is very possible that everything is on the up-and-up,
and you do not want to risk the legal and morale problems that can stem
from unfairly accusing an innocent employee.
If, on the other hand, evidence points to fraud, don’t hesitate to take
appropriate action. If you find one bona fide instance of fraud, further
investigation will probably turn up more. Reassign sensitive
responsibilities as necessary to isolate the suspected employee from the
potentially fraudulent situation. Then initiate your own investigation, or
call in a fraud examiner to conduct it for you.
Establish controls and audit procedures. Among the normal control
procedures are (i) establishing quality control programs; (ii) sampling
and retracing the work of employees who are in fraud-sensitive positions;
(iii) reviewing unusual transactions; and (iv) requiring that all
reconciliations receive an independent review.
Ideally, you would segregate related financial and asset management
functions – e.g., handling cash, preparing deposits, reconciling accounts,
taking inventory — among two or more employees, so that no individual
accumulates too much control. If segregation isn’t feasible, you should
monitor those functions frequently, so that the employees who are
responsible for those functions won’t begin to believe that they are free
of accountability.
If you lack confidence in your ability to establish proper controls, a CPA
who regularly works with business clients should be able to point you in
the right direction.
No substitute for your own vigilance. Whether you create your own
controls and conduct your own investigation or call on an outside
professional, there are two responsibilities that you cannot effectively
farm out: your day-to-day vigilance in watching what goes on in your
company, and maintaining a healthy skepticism in holding your employees
accountable for their actions.
Based in Mesa, Arizona, and serving closely held businesses in the East Valley,
the Phoenix area and throughout Arizona, Schmidt Westergard & Company, PLLC, is
an independent full-service tax, audit, accounting and business advisory firm
focusing on the middle market.
|